{"id":126870,"date":"2024-09-03T12:28:11","date_gmt":"2024-09-03T12:28:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/03\/brazils-supreme-court-upholds-x-ban-despite-elon-musk-backlash\/"},"modified":"2024-09-03T12:28:12","modified_gmt":"2024-09-03T12:28:12","slug":"brazils-supreme-court-upholds-x-ban-despite-elon-musk-backlash","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/03\/brazils-supreme-court-upholds-x-ban-despite-elon-musk-backlash\/","title":{"rendered":"Brazil’s Supreme Court upholds X ban – despite Elon Musk backlash"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Brazil’s<\/div>


\n<\/p>\n

\n

Brazil’s Supreme Court has unanimously upheld a decision to block Elon Musk’s social media platform X.<\/p>\n

The move undermines the billionaire businessman’s claims the original judge who banned the platform “violated the constitution of Brazil repeatedly and egregiously, after swearing an oath to protect it”.<\/p>\n

The tech tycoon posted a series of messages on X casting the judge as an authoritarian rebel who acted unconstitutionally and wanted to politically censor the Brazilian people.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>
\n Image:<\/span>
\n Justice Alexandre de Moraes has the support of the Supreme Court. File pic: AP
\n <\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Now that judge, Justice Alexandre de Moraes, has the support of the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

The panel that voted in a virtual session comprised of five of the full bench’s 11 justices, including Justice de Moraes.<\/p>\n

Last Friday, he ordered the platform to be blocked for refusing to name a local legal representative, as required by law.<\/p>\n

Read more: X ordered to be taken down by judge in Brazil over dispute with Elon Musk<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

It will stay suspended until it complies with his orders and pays outstanding fines that as of last week exceeded \u00a32.3m, according to his decision.<\/p>\n

X clashed with Justice de Moraes over its reluctance to block users. It alleged the judge wanted an in-country legal representative so that Brazilian authorities can exert leverage over the company by having someone to arrest.<\/p>\n

More from science and technology:<\/strong>
UK’s first ‘teacherless’ AI classroom set to open in London<\/a><\/strong>
How will two astronauts stuck in space pass time until 2025?<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Justice de Moraes also set a daily fine of 50,000 reais (\u00a36,785) for people or companies using virtual private networks, or VPNs, to access X.<\/p>\n

Some legal experts questioned the grounds for that decision and how it would be enforced, including Brazil’s bar association, which said it would request the Supreme Court review that provision.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n \"Follow
\n <\/source><\/source><\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n Follow Sky News on WhatsApp<\/span><\/p>\n

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News<\/p>\n

Tap here<\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

But the majority of the panel upheld the VPN fine, with one justice opposing unless users are shown to be using X to commit crimes.<\/p>\n

The ban also sets up a showdown between Justice de Moraes and Musk’s satellite internet provider Starlink, which is refusing to enforce the justice’s decision.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n


\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Brazil’s Supreme Court has unanimously upheld a decision to block Elon Musk’s social media platform X. The move undermines the billionaire businessman’s claims the original judge who banned the platform “violated the constitution of Brazil repeatedly and egregiously, after swearing an oath to protect it”. The tech tycoon posted a series of messages on X […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":126871,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/e3.365dm.com\/24\/09\/768x432\/skynews-x-brazil_6675567.jpg?20240903113838","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[13607,230,13406,1625,2534,6039,1624,22483],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126870"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126870"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":126872,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126870\/revisions\/126872"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/126871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}