{"id":167980,"date":"2024-11-04T21:08:37","date_gmt":"2024-11-04T21:08:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/11\/04\/facebook-nvidia-ask-us-supreme-court-to-spare-them-from-securities-fraud-suits\/"},"modified":"2024-11-04T21:08:37","modified_gmt":"2024-11-04T21:08:37","slug":"facebook-nvidia-ask-us-supreme-court-to-spare-them-from-securities-fraud-suits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/11\/04\/facebook-nvidia-ask-us-supreme-court-to-spare-them-from-securities-fraud-suits\/","title":{"rendered":"Facebook, Nvidia Ask US Supreme Court to Spare Them from Securities Fraud Suits"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align:center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" src=\"https:\/\/i3.wp.com\/i.gadgets360cdn.com\/large\/facebook_unsplash_Solen_Feyissa_1704264456373.jpg?fit=1200,675&amp;ssl=1\" class=\"attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"Facebook, Nvidia Ask US Supreme Court to Spare Them from Securities Fraud Suits\" title=\"Facebook, Nvidia Ask US Supreme Court to Spare Them from Securities Fraud Suits\" \/><\/div><p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The US Supreme Court is set to consider bids by two tech giants &#8211; Meta&#8217;s Facebook and Nvidia &#8211; to fend off federal securities fraud lawsuits in separate cases that could make it harder for private litigants to hold companies to account.<\/p>\n<p>After a trio of Supreme Court rulings in June that weakened federal regulators &#8211; including the Securities and Exchange Commission that polices securities fraud &#8211; the justices may now be poised to rein in the power of private plaintiffs to enforce federal rules aimed at punishing corporate misconduct.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Andrew Feller, a former SEC lawyer now in private practice, said the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent track record of handing down business-friendly decisions that narrowed the authority of federal regulators suggests that <a class=\"sp_lnk2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gadgets360.com\/tags\/facebook\">Facebook<\/a> and <a class=\"sp_lnk2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gadgets360.com\/tags\/nvidia\">Nvidia<\/a> may similarly find &#8220;a receptive audience&#8221; before the justices.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think business interests will continue their recent pattern of aggressively challenging rules intended to hold them accountable, including by challenging the remaining private rights of action,&#8221; Feller said.<\/p>\n<p>A private right of action refers to the ability of a private person or group to sue for an alleged harm.<\/p>\n<p>Social media platform Facebook and artificial intelligence chipmaker Nvidia appealed to the Supreme Court after the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals allowed separate class action securities fraud lawsuits to proceed against them.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday is due to hear arguments in Facebook&#8217;s bid to dismiss a suit accusing the company of misleading investors in violation of the Securities Exchange Act, a 1934 federal law that requires publicly traded companies to disclose their business risks.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs, a group of Facebook investors led by Amalgamated Bank, accused the company in a 2018 class action of withholding information from investors about a 2015 data breach involving British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica that affected more than 30 million Facebook users.<\/p>\n<p>The suit arose after Facebook&#8217;s stock fell following 2018 media reports that Cambridge Analytica had used improperly harvested Facebook user data in connection with Donald Trump&#8217;s successful presidential campaign in 2016. The suit seeks unspecified monetary damages in part to recoup the lost value of the Facebook stock held by the investors.<\/p>\n<p>At issue is whether Facebook broke the law when it failed to detail the prior data breach in subsequent business-risk disclosures, and instead portrayed the risk of such incidents as purely hypothetical.<\/p>\n<p>Facebook in its Supreme Court filing argued, among other things, that it was not required to state that its warned-of risk had already materialized because &#8220;a reasonable investor would understand (risk disclosures) to be forward-looking and probabilistic in nature.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The SEC in 2019 brought an enforcement action against Facebook over the matter, which the company settled for $100 million (roughly Rs. 841 crore). Facebook paid a separate $5 billion (roughly Rs.\u00a042,054 crore) penalty to the US Federal Trade Commission over the Cambridge Analytica issue.<\/p>\n<p>Michael Perino, a professor at St. John&#8217;s University School of Law in New York, described private rights of action as &#8220;a necessary supplement&#8221; to public enforcement efforts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The SEC is arguably under-resourced given the broad scope of its responsibilities,&#8221; Perino said. &#8220;Securities class action lawsuits effectively deputise private attorneys to bring actions on behalf of aggrieved investors.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Nvidia Crypto-Related Purchases<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme Court on November 13 is due to hear arguments in Nvidia&#8217;s bid to scuttle a securities class action accusing the Santa Clara, California-based company of misleading investors about how much of its sales went to the volatile <a class=\"sp_lnk2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gadgets360.com\/tags\/cryptocurrency\">cryptocurrency<\/a> industry.<\/p>\n<p>The 2018 suit, led by the Stockholm-based investment management firm E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, accused Nvidia of violating the Securities Exchange Act by making statements in 2017 and 2018 that falsely downplayed how much of the company&#8217;s revenue growth came from crypto-related purchases.<\/p>\n<p>Those omissions misled investors and analysts who were interested in understanding the impact of cryptom ining on Nvidia&#8217;s business, the plaintiffs said.<\/p>\n<p>In its Supreme Court filing, Nvidia said the plaintiffs had failed to clear the legal bar set in a 1995 federal law called Private Securities Litigation Reform Act that established the standard for bringing private securities fraud suits.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia in 2022 agreed to pay $5.5 million (roughly Rs. 46 crore) to US authorities to settle charges that it did not properly disclose the impact of crypto mining on its gaming business. \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>David Shargel, a lawyer in private practice who has represented clients before the SEC, said private securities litigation could gain prominence due to recent Supreme Court rulings weakening federal regulators.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Among the cases Shargel cited was a June 27 decision that rejected the SEC&#8217;s in-house enforcement of laws protecting investors against securities fraud as a violation of the US Constitution&#8217;s Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This could further tax the commission&#8217;s resources, as well as those of other agencies looking to bring fraud-like claims, opening the door for more private litigation,&#8221; Shargel said of the SEC.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s hard to predict exactly which way private actions will trend,&#8221; Shargel added, &#8220;but it&#8217;s not hard to imagine that they may take on greater significance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a9 Thomson Reuters 2024<\/em><\/p>\n<p><i>(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gadgets360.com\/internet\/news\/facebook-nvidia-us-supreme-court-spare-securities-fraud-suits-6942018#rss-gadgets-news\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The US Supreme Court is set to consider bids by two tech giants &#8211; Meta&#8217;s Facebook and Nvidia &#8211; to fend off federal securities fraud lawsuits in separate cases that could make it harder for private litigants to hold companies to account. After a trio of Supreme Court rulings in June that weakened federal regulators [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":167981,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/i.gadgets360cdn.com\/large\/facebook_unsplash_Solen_Feyissa_1704264456373.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[607],"tags":[1274,1625,8353,779,130073,6229,2474,6168,11746,2261,9112,1624],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167980"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167980"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167980\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":167982,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167980\/revisions\/167982"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/167981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}