{"id":173123,"date":"2024-11-12T09:53:15","date_gmt":"2024-11-12T09:53:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/11\/12\/shell-wins-landmark-climate-case-against-green-groups-in-dutch-appeal\/"},"modified":"2024-11-12T09:53:15","modified_gmt":"2024-11-12T09:53:15","slug":"shell-wins-landmark-climate-case-against-green-groups-in-dutch-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/11\/12\/shell-wins-landmark-climate-case-against-green-groups-in-dutch-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"Shell wins landmark climate case against green groups in Dutch appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align:center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/i3.wp.com\/ichef.bbci.co.uk\/news\/1024\/branded_news\/7491\/live\/1b5f1250-a0cd-11ef-8ab9-9192db313061.jpg?fit=1024,576&amp;ssl=1\" class=\"attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"Shell wins landmark climate case against green groups in Dutch appeal\" title=\"Shell wins landmark climate case against green groups in Dutch appeal\" \/><\/div><p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div data-component=\"text-block\">\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Oil giant Shell has won a landmark case in the Dutch courts, overturning an earlier ruling requiring it to cuts its carbon emissions by 45%.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">The Hague court of appeal said it could not establish that Shell had a &#8220;social standard of care&#8221; to reduce its emissions by 45% or any other amount, even though it agreed the company had an obligation to citizens to limit emissions.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Three years ago, a court in The Hague backed a case by Friends of the Earth and 17,000 Dutch citizens requiring Shell to reduce its CO2 emissions significantly, in line with the Paris climate accords.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">The ruling came as climate talks involving some 200 countries got under way in Azerbaijan.<!-- --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div data-component=\"text-block\">\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Shell said it was pleased with the court&#8217;s decision, but Friends of the Earth Netherlands said the ruling was a setback that affected them deeply.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">The environmental group can now take its case against Shell to the Supreme Court &#8211; but a final verdict could be years away.  <!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Donald Pols from the group said &#8220;it&#8217;s a marathon, not a sprint and the race isn&#8217;t yet over&#8221;.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">At the time, the 2021 ruling marked the first time a court had ordered a private company to align its workings with the Paris climate agreement, meaning that it was not sufficient for a company simply to comply with the law &#8211; it had to comply with global climate policy too.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Under the terms of the Paris Agreement on climate change, nearly 200 nations agreed to keep global temperatures &#8220;well below&#8221; 2C above pre-industrial levels.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">The appeals court judge said that companies such as Shell were obliged to contribute to combating climate change based on the human right to protection against dangerous climate change.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">However, the court said Shell was already working to reduce its emissions and the court could not establish whether it should make a 45% cut or another percentage, as there was no current accepted agreement in climate science on the required amount.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Shell has argued that it is already taking &#8220;serious steps to reduce emissions&#8221;. It complained the original ruling was unfair as it singled out one company for a global issue, and said it was unrealistic to try to hold Shell accountable for its customers&#8217; choices.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Shell said if people considered progress was too slow towards cutting emissions then they should lobby governments rather than Shell to change policies and bring about a green transition.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">The oil firm says its aim is to reduce the carbon intensity of products it sells by 15-20% by 2030 from a 2016 baseline. Shell also aims to become a &#8220;net zero&#8221; emissions company by 2050.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Part of the historic legal case hinged on the interpretation of an &#8220;unwritten duty of care&#8221; that exists under Dutch law, which requires companies to prevent hazardous negligence.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Friends of the Earth Netherlands argued that there was an international consensus that human rights offered protection against dangerous climate change and that companies had to respect human rights.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">Shell&#8217;s successful appeal could have far-reaching implications for corporate climate responsibility.<!-- --><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-eb7bd5f6-0 fYAfXe\">A number of environmental groups around the world are now trying to force companies and governments to comply with the accords through the courts.<!-- --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/cx240l9xq2yo\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oil giant Shell has won a landmark case in the Dutch courts, overturning an earlier ruling requiring it to cuts its carbon emissions by 45%. The Hague court of appeal said it could not establish that Shell had a &#8220;social standard of care&#8221; to reduce its emissions by 45% or any other amount, even though [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":173124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/ichef.bbci.co.uk\/news\/1024\/branded_news\/7491\/live\/1b5f1250-a0cd-11ef-8ab9-9192db313061.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[604],"tags":[4269,1287,486,17308,6740,726,898,790,8613],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173123"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173123"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173123\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":173125,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173123\/revisions\/173125"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/173124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}