{"id":197914,"date":"2024-12-18T20:18:04","date_gmt":"2024-12-18T20:18:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/12\/18\/what-will-space-exploration-look-like-under-trump\/"},"modified":"2024-12-18T20:18:04","modified_gmt":"2024-12-18T20:18:04","slug":"what-will-space-exploration-look-like-under-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/12\/18\/what-will-space-exploration-look-like-under-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"What will space exploration look like under Trump?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align:center\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.sciencenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/121624_lg_space-policy_inline.jpg?resize=680%2C382&amp;ssl=1\" class=\"attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"What will space exploration look like under Trump?\" title=\"What will space exploration look like under Trump?\" \/><\/div> \r\n<br><div data-component=\"video-embed\">\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\n\n\n<p>The future of U.S. space exploration and NASA-funded science is up in the air as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to return to office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s just so many question marks,\u201d says political scientist Victoria Samson. Where will humans go in space, and when? What will SpaceX billionaire and close presidential adviser Elon Musk\u2019s influence be over NASA and space policy? What does the nomination of billionaire space tourist Jared Isaacman to lead NASA mean?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIf I have one thing to say, everything is unclear,\u201d says Samson, who is in the Washington, D.C., office of the Secure World Foundation, a nonprofit space sustainability organization. \u201cAnything could happen.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n<aside class=\"sn-conversion rich-text rich-text--with-sidebar\">\n<style><![CDATA[\n.email-conversion {\n  border: 1px solid #ffcccb;\n  color: white;\n  margin-top: 50px;\n  background-image: url(\"\/wp-content\/themes\/sciencenews\/client\/src\/images\/cta-module@2x.jpg\");\n  padding: 20px;\n  clear: both;\n}\n\n]]><\/style>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"rich-text embedded-conversion-content is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container\">\n<style><![CDATA[\n#dynamic-wrapper {\n  border: 1px solid #ffcccb;\n  background-image: url(\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/cta_background_aurora.jpg\");\n  background-size: cover;\n  background-position: center center;\n  padding: 20px;\n  clear: both;\n}\n\n#dynamic-conversion {\n  padding: 20px;\n  background:rgba(0,0,0, 0.5);\n  color: white;\n}\n\n#dynamic-conversion h2 {\n  color: white;\n}\n\np.has-text-align-center a {\n  color: white !important;\n  text-decoration: none;\n  font-weight: bold;\n}\n\n]]><\/style>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"dynamic-wrapper\" class=\"wp-block-group\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<div id=\"dynamic-conversion\" class=\"wp-block-group\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\">\n\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center\"><strong>Have feedback for Science News?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\">Help us improve by telling us about your experience<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/aside>\n\n\n<p>Space scientists are making predictions based on things Trump and his allies have said in the past. Naming Isaacman as his pick to be the next NASA administrator reflects priorities for space exploration that had already been telegraphed during the election: getting boots on the ground of another world, as quickly as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That other world is probably the moon. But it could be Mars, if some in Trump\u2019s orbit get their way. And while human and commercial spaceflight will probably get a boost in the next administration, it\u2019s less clear what the future holds for astronomy and pure space science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here\u2019s what <em>Science News <\/em>will be watching in the coming years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How (and when) will NASA return humans to the moon?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Every time there\u2019s a change in presidential administrations, there\u2019s a corresponding change in destination for humans in space. In the early 2000s, George W. Bush directed NASA to land astronauts on the moon again \u201cno later than 2020.\u201d In 2010, Barack Obama cancelled that program and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/not-your-grandfathers-space-program\">aimed humans at asteroids instead<\/a> <em>(SN: 4\/15\/10). <\/em>In 2017, Trump scrapped that plan and swung back toward the moon with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/artemis-mission-new-diverse-crew-astronauts-moon\">Artemis program<\/a> <em>(SN: 12\/1\/22).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That destination will probably remain stable through the second Trump presidency. Artemis continued under Joe Biden, and NASA currently plans to land humans on the moon in 2027 with the Artemis III mission (a slip of about three years from the original goal of 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One question raised by Trump\u2019s election is how astronauts will get there. Right now, Artemis III is supposed to launch on NASA\u2019s long-awaited Space Launch System, or SLS. The plan is that the astronauts will rendezvous with a SpaceX Starship vehicle in orbit, which will take them to the surface of the moon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But SLS has been off schedule and over budget for years. The first SLS flight, originally set for 2017, was in November 2022. NASA had spent $11.8 billion on developing the rocket up to that point, and would need to spend billions more per launch going forward, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gao.gov\/products\/gao-23-105609\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Government Accountability Office report<\/a> in 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Isaacman himself has been openly critical of the program as an example of government inefficiency. The rocket is almost certainly <a href=\"https:\/\/www.space.com\/space-exploration\/artemis\/trump-may-cancel-nasas-powerful-sls-moon-rocket-heres-what-that-would-mean-for-elon-musk-and-the-future-of-space-travel\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">on the chopping block<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI think most people see SLS as a dead program walking,\u201d says space policy expert Casey Dreier of the Planetary Society, who is based in Bellingham, Wash. \u201cI think the question at this point is how quickly the SLS project winds down, rather than if it continues.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n<aside class=\"sn-conversion rich-text rich-text--with-sidebar\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-elements-27c40654034fbeecef6418d6adfe0794\" style=\"color:gray; margin-bottom:0px; font-size:.9rem;\">Sponsor Message<\/p>\n<!-- Tag ID: sciencenews-org_leaderboard_incontent -->\n\n<\/aside>\n\n\n<p>There\u2019s a chance SLS will survive long enough to launch Artemis III. The U.S. Congress could fight to keep its funding steady, and thereby keep related jobs in states with NASA centers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And for all its problems, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/moon-artemis-launch-human-spaceflight-apollo-nasa-china\">SLS has already flown<\/a> and is all set for the second Artemis launch, scheduled for April 2026 <em>(SN: 11\/16\/22)<\/em>. Starship has had test launches. But it hasn\u2019t done any dockings in space or landed on the moon without people, crucial steps before Artemis III can happen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe big delay on Artemis III is whether Starship will be ready,\u201d Dreier says. \u201cThat\u2019s a very nontrivial set of problems to solve.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another question is whether the United States will continue its participation in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/artemis-accords\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Artemis Accords<\/a>, a nonbinding guidance document for activities on the moon established in 2020, during the first Trump administration. The accords state NASA\u2019s intention to explore space peacefully and transparently, in cooperation with other nations, and to share scientific data, among other things. More than 50 countries have signed onto the accords, many of which don\u2019t have their own space programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The United States is effectively saying \u201cwe want to go there, and go together,\u201d Samson says. \u201cIt\u2019s a question if the U.S. will continue this diplomatic outreach, which I would argue has been incredibly successful.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Will we put boots on Mars or return samples from the Red Planet?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Through all the zigzags in NASA\u2019s marching orders, the eventual <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/nasa-bets-asteroid-mission-best-path-mars\">goal was always to send humans to Mars<\/a> <em>(SN: 8\/8\/14)<\/em>. That goal <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/science\/2024\/10\/27\/trump-musk-mars\/?_pml=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">may become a higher priority<\/a> in the second Trump administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sending humans to Mars has long been a stated goal for SpaceX, and for Musk personally. He has posted on his social media site, X, <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/elonmusk\/status\/1837908705683059166?prefetchTimestamp=1734027020354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">that SpaceX could send humans to Mars<\/a> within the next four years. That\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54012-0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">not really feasible<\/a>, a team of mechanical and aerospace engineers reported earlier this year in <em>Scientific Reports<\/em>. But the drive is there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Trump talked explicitly about accelerating trips to Mars on the campaign trail. In an October rally in Pennsylvania, for example, he said, \u201cWe will land an American astronaut on Mars\u2026. Get ready, Elon, get ready. We gotta land it, we gotta do it quickly.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And Isaacman called out Mars in his <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/rookisaacman\/status\/1864346915183157636\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">post on X accepting the nomination<\/a> for NASA administrator (an appointment that requires Senate confirmation). \u201cAmericans will walk on the Moon and Mars and in doing so, we will make life better here on Earth,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meanwhile, NASA\u2019s plan to bring Mars rocks back to Earth is on shaky ground. The agency\u2019s Mars Sample Return program was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/nasas-budget-woes-space-research-risk\">hit hard by budget cuts in 2024<\/a> <em>(SN: 5\/8\/24)<\/em>. In June, NASA put out a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpl.nasa.gov\/news\/nasa-exploring-alternative-mars-sample-return-methods\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">call for new ideas<\/a> for returning Mars samples with private companies \u2014 including SpaceX.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s a lot of different things that we\u2019re considering,\u201d said Lindsay Hays, a Mars scientist at NASA Headquarters, during a December 12 news briefing at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union in Washington, D.C. \u201cWe\u2019re hoping that we\u2019ll be able to have some new plan moving forward early next year.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><span class=\"caption wp-caption-3147663\">NASA and private space companies both hope to build a sustainable human-occupied outpost on the moon (illustrated). Trump\u2019s election raises the question of whether humans will go to Mars first.<\/span><span class=\"credit wp-credit-3147663\">NASA<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Will low Earth orbit see more satellites and launch competition?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Musk is already a big player in low Earth orbit. SpaceX has launched thousands of satellites in its Starlink project to bring wireless internet access to a broad swath of the planet. Other companies are launching their own versions. These satellite constellations <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/satellite-mega-constellations-night-sky-stars-simulations\">threaten scientists\u2019 ability to do astronomy<\/a> and may <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/satellite-space-junk-havoc-stratosphere\">wreak havoc on the stratosphere<\/a> at the end of their lives <em>(SN: 9\/20\/21, SN: 11\/22\/24)<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The billionaire has also been tapped to help lead a new Department of Government Efficiency \u2014 an outside advisory commission that Trump has said will \u201cdismantle government bureaucracy\u201d and \u201cslash excess regulations.\u201d That, along with the fact that Musk donated <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/12\/05\/us\/politics\/elon-musk-trump-rbg-election.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">at least $250 million<\/a> to Trump\u2019s reelection campaign, creates a potential conflict of interest, Eric Berger, the senior space editor at <em>Ars Technica<\/em>, has noted. \u201cMusk is unquestionably in a position for self-dealing,\u201d Berger <a href=\"https:\/\/arstechnica.com\/space\/2024\/11\/space-policy-is-about-to-get-pretty-wild-yall\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">wrote on November 8<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Musk has sparred with the Environmental Protection Agency over <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legaldive.com\/news\/elon-musk-takes-campaign-against-the-regulatory-state-from-labor-to-aviatio\/728337\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">environmental impacts at SpaceX\u2019s launch site in Texas<\/a>, and with the Federal Aviation Administration over fines for safety issues and launch regulations. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/news\/world\/americas\/us-politics\/faa-trump-elon-musk-federal-aviation-authority-whitaker-b2663882.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">current head of the FAA will resign<\/a> before Trump takes office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s been frustration, at least for Elon, at what he feels to be onerous requirements by the FAA and EPA,\u201d Samson says. She wonders if environmental impact statements and launch requirements will be loosened or eradicated in the next administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As for private human spaceflight, SpaceX is largely the only game in town. \u201cSpaceX has become, frankly, the de facto monopoly of launch right now,\u201d Dreier says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But that monopoly might not last. Colorado-based company United Launch Alliance has launched its <a href=\"https:\/\/newsroom.ulalaunch.com\/releases\/united-launch-alliance-successfully-launches-second-vulcan-certification-flight\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Vulcan<\/a> heavy-lift vehicle twice. On December 10, the company Blue Origin announced its intention to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.blueorigin.com\/news\/blue-ring-pathfinder-payload\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">fly its New Glenn<\/a> heavy-lift rocket before the end of the year. And California-based company Rocket Lab aims to complete its own reuseable rocket, called <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rocketlabusa.com\/launch\/neutron\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Neutron<\/a>, in 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWe actually have a diversity of launch providers, which is very powerful,\u201d says space business and policy expert Zaheer Ali of Arizona State University in Phoenix.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One question for the coming years is what will become of these other launch companies. If they succeed, there could be many ways to get to space, healthy competition between companies and backup options if one of them fails. But some space policy experts worry that Musk\u2019s influence could lead to policy changes that benefit SpaceX at the expense of its competitors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What about space science in general?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Isaacman\u2019s nomination was met with surprise and a certain amount of relief in the astronomy community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The billionaire\u2019s enthusiasm for human spaceflight is obvious. In the past five years, he has funded two commercial SpaceX flights, flying as an active crew member on both. He offered to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.space.com\/jared-isaacman-hubble-space-telescope-reboost\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">boost the Hubble Space Telescope to a higher orbit<\/a>, thus extending its lifetime, on a future private spaceflight (NASA declined). And he wrote a letter to current NASA administrator Bill Nelson in April, advocating for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/nasas-budget-woes-space-research-risk\">saving the space-based Chandra X-ray Observatory<\/a> from funding cuts (<em>SN: 5\/8\/24<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI do believe Isaacman is going to be a significant proponent of science and basic research,\u201d Ali says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"680\" height=\"382\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.sciencenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/121624_lg_space-policy_inline2.jpg?resize=680%2C382&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"A bunch of people in a control room are looking at a set of screens mounted on a wall showing images and date related to the Chandra X-ray telescope.\" class=\"wp-image-3147707\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.sciencenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/121624_lg_space-policy_inline2.jpg?w=680&amp;ssl=1 680w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.sciencenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/121624_lg_space-policy_inline2.jpg?resize=330%2C186&amp;ssl=1 330w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><span class=\"caption wp-caption-3147707\">Jared Isaacman (center, black shirt, with his back to the camera) visited the Chandra X-ray telescope\u2019s command center in Burlington, Mass., in June, when the telescope\u2019s funding was in jeopardy. Some astronomers hope this interest translates to protected funding for space science if Isaacman becomes the next NASA administrator.<\/span><span class=\"credit wp-credit-3147707\">Jonathan McDowell<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>But with the new Department of Government Efficiency, funding cuts are anticipated across the board, and NASA is unlikely to escape them, Dreier says. \u201cI think what we can say for relatively certain is that NASA will be facing diminished budgets for at least the next couple of years,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the expected increased focus on human spaceflight, those cuts will probably hit NASA science hardest, he says. At particular risk are projects studying Earth and its climate, which Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/trump-affect-climate-actions-research\">tried to cut during his first term in office<\/a> (<em>SN: 11\/25\/24<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s not clear how NASA\u2019s priorities in space will shake out. The last decadal survey in 2021, a document in which the astronomy community <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/space-science-next-10-years-decadal-survey\">laid out its priorities for the following 10 years of missions and spacecraft<\/a>, identified several space-based observatories that could replace the aging fleet of Great Observatories, including Chandra and Hubble (<em>SN: 11\/4\/21<\/em>). But launch costs and budget constraints already hamper those ambitions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More commercial launches with rockets that are larger than what\u2019s currently available could reduce the cost of each mission, and so allow more of them to fly, some astronomers argue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cAssuming it is successful, Starship will dramatically enhance our space capabilities in ways that will qualitatively alter how astrophysics missions can be built,\u201d astronomers Martin Elvis, Charles Lawrence and Sara Seager wrote in a <a href=\"https:\/\/pubs.aip.org\/physicstoday\/article\/76\/2\/40\/2869438\/Accelerating-astrophysics-with-the-SpaceX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 essay in <em>Physics Today<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Other astronomers are already thinking about how to make the human spaceflight focus useful for science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cA lot of us are concerned about Artemis eating up all the science budget,\u201d astronomer Tom Maccarone of Texas Tech University in Lubbock said at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/first-astrosphere-sunlike-star-moth\">a recent meeting in Boston for astronomers who use the Chandra telescope<\/a> (<em>SN: 12\/6\/24<\/em>). \u201cMaybe we should think about how to use that to our advantage rather than suffering from it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He nodded toward proposals to build telescopes on the moon, where certain observations can be made more easily than on Earth. \u201cThere may be free rides,\u201d he said. \u201cIf we want to do it in the 2050s, we should start thinking seriously about it now.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But, Ali says, which research projects get to hitch those rides might not be decided by NASA, and might not favor pure science. He anticipates that NASA mission leaders may be asked to justify to Congress how their projects will contribute to other national priorities, aside from great science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Staff writer Nikk Ogasa contributed to this story.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n<br>\r\n<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/space-exploration-nasa-trump\">Source link <\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The future of U.S. space exploration and NASA-funded science is up in the air as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to return to office. \u201cThere\u2019s just so many question marks,\u201d says political scientist Victoria Samson. Where will humans go in space, and when? What will SpaceX billionaire and close presidential adviser Elon Musk\u2019s influence be over [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":197915,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.sciencenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/121624_lg_space-policy_inline.jpg?resize=680%2C382&ssl=1","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[606],"tags":[68740,28,52],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197914"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197914"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197914\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":197916,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197914\/revisions\/197916"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/197915"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}