{"id":88135,"date":"2024-07-05T09:15:09","date_gmt":"2024-07-05T09:15:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/07\/05\/trump-advisers-call-for-u-s-nuclear-weapons-testing-if-he-is-elected\/"},"modified":"2024-07-05T09:15:10","modified_gmt":"2024-07-05T09:15:10","slug":"trump-advisers-call-for-u-s-nuclear-weapons-testing-if-he-is-elected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/2024\/07\/05\/trump-advisers-call-for-u-s-nuclear-weapons-testing-if-he-is-elected\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump Advisers Call for U.S. Nuclear Weapons Testing if He Is Elected"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align:center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1050\" height=\"550\" src=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2024\/07\/03\/science\/00nuclear-testing\/00nuclear-testing-facebookJumbo.jpg?fit=1050,550&amp;ssl=1\" class=\"attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"Trump Advisers Call for U.S. Nuclear Weapons Testing if He Is Elected\" title=\"Trump Advisers Call for U.S. Nuclear Weapons Testing if He Is Elected\" \/><\/div><p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Allies of Donald J. Trump are proposing that the United States restart the testing of nuclear weapons in underground detonations should the former president be re-elected in November. A number of nuclear experts reject such a resumption as unnecessary and say it would threaten to end a testing moratorium that the world\u2019s major atomic powers have honored for decades.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In the latest issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/09\/18\/us\/politics\/national-security-adviser-robert-obrien.html\" title=\"\">Robert C. O\u2019Brien<\/a>, a former national security adviser to Mr. Trump, urges him to conduct nuclear tests if he wins a new term. Washington, <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.foreignaffairs.com\/united-states\/return-peace-strength-trump-obrien\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">he wrote<\/a>, \u201cmust test new nuclear weapons for reliability and safety in the real world for the first time since 1992.\u201d Doing so, he added, would help the United States \u201cmaintain technical and numerical superiority to the combined Chinese and Russian nuclear stockpiles.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">At the Cold War\u2019s end, in 1992, the United States <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/discover.lanl.gov\/publications\/national-security-science\/2022-winter\/divider-30-years-later\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">gave up<\/a> the explosive testing of nuclear arms and eventually talked other atomic powers into <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/factsheets\/status-comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-signatories-and-ratifiers\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">doing likewise<\/a>. The United States instead turned to experts and machines at the nation\u2019s weapons labs to verify the lethality of the country\u2019s arsenal. Today the machines include room-size <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/05\/30\/business\/us-supercomputer-frontier.html\" title=\"\">supercomputers<\/a>, the world\u2019s most powerful <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/science-innovation.lanl.gov\/science-facilities\/darht\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">X-ray machine<\/a> and a system of lasers <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/lasers.llnl.gov\/about\/what-national-ignition-facility\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">the size of a sports stadium<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In his article, Mr. O\u2019Brien described such work as just \u201cusing computer models.\u201d Republican members of Congress and some nuclear experts <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/2020\/06\/the-nuclear-testing-showdown\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">have faulted<\/a> the nonexplosive testing as insufficient to assure the U.S. military establishment that its arsenal works, and have called for live tests.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">But the Biden administration and other Democrats warn that a U.S. test could lead to a chain reaction of testing by other countries. Over time, they add, resumption could result in a nuclear arms race that destabilizes the <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1969\/11\/18\/archives\/the-nuclear-arsenals-a-balance-of-terror.html\" title=\"\">global balance of terror<\/a> and heightens the risk of war.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cIt\u2019s a terrible idea,\u201d said <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nti.org\/about\/people\/ernest-moniz\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Ernest J. Moniz<\/a>, who oversaw the U.S. nuclear arsenal as the secretary of energy in the Obama administration. \u201cNew testing would make us less secure. You can\u2019t divorce it from the global repercussions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\"><a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/nonproliferation.org\/experts\/siegfried-sig-hecker\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Siegfried S. Hecker<\/a>, a former director of the Los Alamos weapons lab in New Mexico where J. Robert Oppenheimer <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/01\/17\/us\/politics\/atomic-bomb-secret-funding-congress.html\" title=\"\">led the creation of the atomic bomb<\/a>, called new testing a risky trade-off between domestic gains and global losses. \u201cWe stand to lose more\u201d than America\u2019s nuclear rivals would, he said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">It\u2019s unclear if Mr. Trump would act on the testing proposals. In a statement, Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles, Mr. Trump\u2019s co-campaign managers, did not directly address the candidate\u2019s position on nuclear testing. They said that Mr. O\u2019Brien as well as other outside groups and individuals were \u201cmisguided, speaking prematurely, and may well be entirely wrong\u201d about a second Trump administration\u2019s plans.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Even so, Mr. Trump\u2019s history of atomic bluster, threats and <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/events\/2019-07\/critical-evaluation-trump-administrations-nuclear-weapons-policies\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">hard-line policies<\/a> suggests that he may be open to such guidance from his security advisers. In 2018, he <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/01\/02\/us\/politics\/trump-tweet-north-korea.html\" title=\"\">boasted<\/a> that his \u201cNuclear Button\u201d was \u201cmuch bigger &amp; more powerful\u201d than the force controller of Kim Jong Un, the North Korean leader.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">A U.S. detonation would violate the <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/factsheets\/comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-glance\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty<\/a>, long considered one of the most successful arms control measures. Signed by the world\u2019s atomic powers in 1996, it sought to curb a costly arms race that had spun out of control.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">During the Cold War, China <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/factsheets\/nucleartesttally\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">set off<\/a> 45 test explosions, France 210, Russia 715 and the United States 1,030, with the goal of uncovering flaws in weapon designs and verifying their reliability.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Nuclear experts <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.amacad.org\/news\/comprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty-20\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">say<\/a> that the test disparities give Washington a military edge because it keeps other powers from making their arsenals more diverse and deadly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In 2017, Mr. Trump\u2019s presidential inauguration revived the possibility of new testing. In addition to <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/trump-administration-discussed-conducting-first-us-nuclear-test-in-decades\/2020\/05\/22\/a805c904-9c5b-11ea-b60c-3be060a4f8e1_story.html\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">discussing a restart<\/a>, officials in his administration called for reductions in the preparation time for a U.S. nuclear test resumption. The federal agency in charge of the nation\u2019s nuclear test site <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/blog\/2018-02-04\/npr-rejects-ctbt-ratification-nnsa-shortens-testing-readiness-timeline\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">ordered<\/a> the required time for preparations to drop from years to as little as six months.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Nuclear experts saw the goal as unrealistic because testing equipment at the sprawling site, in the Nevada desert, had <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.airuniversity.af.edu\/Portals\/10\/SSQ\/documents\/Volume-14_Issue-3\/Steeves.pdf\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">fallen into disrepair, or vanished<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Last year, <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/01\/21\/magazine\/heritage-foundation-kevin-roberts.html\" title=\"\">the Heritage Foundation<\/a>, a conservative think tank, recommended that the United States eliminate the preparation time. Its <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/press\/project-2025-publishes-comprehensive-policy-guide-mandate-leadership-the-conservative-promise\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">policy guide<\/a> for conservative presidential candidates called on Washington \u201c<a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/static.project2025.org\/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-12.pdf\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">to move to immediate test readiness<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In his Foreign Affairs article, Mr. O\u2019Brien argued that the Biden administration had responded weakly to <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2023\/04\/19\/us\/politics\/china-nuclear-weapons-russia-arms-treaties.html\" title=\"\">Chinese and Russian buildups of nuclear arms<\/a>. The explosive testing of American arms, he said, would strengthen the U.S. arsenal and help deter America\u2019s foes. His article zeroed in on the safety and reliability of new designs, not ones tested during the Cold War.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cIt would be negligent to field nuclear weapons of novel designs that we have never tested in the real world,\u201d said <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/cftni.org\/expert\/christian-whiton\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Christian Whiton<\/a>, who served as a State Department adviser in the George W. Bush and Trump administrations and provided background research for Mr. O\u2019Brien\u2019s article.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Asked for examples, Mr. Whiton cited two new American weapons that he said were in need of explosive testing. Both are thermonuclear weapons, also known as hydrogen bombs. And both have a destructive force that is many times more powerful than the bomb that leveled Hiroshima.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The first of the cited bombs, the <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/discover.lanl.gov\/publications\/national-security-science\/2021-summer\/w93\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">W93<\/a>, is to fit atop submarine missiles. The Biden administration <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/2022-03\/FY%202022%20SSMP%20March%202022.pdf\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">announced<\/a> its development in March 2022, and Mr. Whiton called it \u201ca completely new design.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">But the Biden administration\u2019s <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/2022-03\/FY%202022%20SSMP%20March%202022.pdf\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">work plan<\/a> for the W93 says otherwise. The warhead, it notes, will rely \u201con currently deployed and previously tested nuclear designs.\u201d Moreover, its makers, at the Los Alamos lab, have <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/discover.lanl.gov\/publications\/national-security-science\/2021-summer\/w93\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">insisted<\/a> that the warhead can be fielded safely and reliably without recourse to more explosive tests.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\"><a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/about.lanl.gov\/leadership\/charlie-nakhleh\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Charles W. Nakhleh<\/a>, the lab\u2019s associate director for weapons physics, <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/discover.lanl.gov\/publications\/national-security-science\/2021-summer\/w93\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">said<\/a> in a Los Alamos publication that the alternatives to live detonations \u201cwill enable us to field the W93 without needing any additional nuclear testing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The other weapon Mr. Whiton cited is the <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/media.defense.gov\/2023\/Oct\/27\/2003329624\/-1\/-1\/1\/B61-13-FACT-SHEET.PDF\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">B61-13<\/a>, a variation of a bomb <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/b61-nuclear-gravity-bomb\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">first deployed<\/a> in 1968. The Biden administration <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.defense.gov\/News\/Releases\/Release\/Article\/3571660\/department-of-defense-announces-pursuit-of-b61-gravity-bomb-variant\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">announced<\/a> its development in October, and Mr. Whiton called it \u201cheavily redesigned.\u201d Even so, the official plan says that its nuclear parts are to be <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/fas.org\/publication\/biden-administration-to-build-a-new-nuclear-bomb\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">salvaged from an older B61 version<\/a> and recycled in the new model.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cThe idea that it\u2019s a big redesign doesn\u2019t hold water,\u201d said <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/fas.org\/expert\/hans-kristensen\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Hans M. Kristensen<\/a>, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, a private research organization in Washington. \u201cThey\u2019ve already tested the part that goes bang.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Mr. Whiton, however, believes that even modest changes \u201cought to be proved in the real world.\u201d He also argued that the United States would have to develop new warheads to counter an emerging class of superfast weapons \u2014 <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/01\/15\/science\/hypersonic-missile-weapons.html\" title=\"\">known as hypersonics<\/a> \u2014 that <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/10\/27\/us\/politics\/china-hypersonic-missile.html\" title=\"\">China<\/a> and <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/03\/02\/world\/europe\/putin-weapons-video-analysis.html\" title=\"\">Russia<\/a> are developing. \u201cIt\u2019s likely that new warhead designs will be necessary,\u201d he said, and will require new testing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Despite the conflicting claims and uncertain election outcomes, nuclear experts say that <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2023\/12\/20\/science\/china-nuclear-tests-lop-nur.html\" title=\"\">China<\/a> and <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/tass.com\/defense\/1573143\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Russia<\/a> are readying their test sites for new detonations, perhaps in case the United States restarts its program, or alternatively to race ahead on their own. Dr. Moniz, the former secretary of energy, said he fears that Washington will go first if Mr. Trump wins a second term.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Mr. Whiton, the former State Department adviser, cast doubt on the idea that a U.S. detonation would set off a global chain reaction. He noted that Russia and China were already building up their arsenals without recourse to new testing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cIt is unclear if existing and aspiring nuclear states would follow us,\u201d he said of a global reaction. \u201cIf they do, the downside is that they might improve their capabilities marginally.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The upside, Mr. Whiton said, is that the United States could study the foreign detonations for clues about their hidden characteristics. It could, for example, monitor the faint rumbles in bedrock from an underground test to estimate a device\u2019s power.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Mr. Whiton added that such readings would, in turn, \u201chelp us update our deterrent properly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The trouble with Mr. Whiton\u2019s point, a number of nuclear experts say, is its unstated corollary: that the world could descend into the rounds of costly moves and countermoves that characterized the Cold War. In this century, they warn, a nuclear arms race could prove to be more global, innovative, deadly and unpredictable.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cChina has much more to gain from resumed testing than we do,\u201d said Dr. Hecker, the former Los Alamos director. \u201cIt would open the door for others to test and reignite an arms race to the peril of the entire world. We shouldn\u2019t go there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-798hid etfikam0\">Michael Gold<!-- --> contributed reporting.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/07\/05\/science\/nuclear-testing-trump.html\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allies of Donald J. Trump are proposing that the United States restart the testing of nuclear weapons in underground detonations should the former president be re-elected in November. A number of nuclear experts reject such a resumption as unnecessary and say it would threaten to end a testing moratorium that the world\u2019s major atomic powers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":88136,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2024\/07\/03\/science\/00nuclear-testing\/00nuclear-testing-facebookJumbo.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[6354,875,2889,3101,10169,52,221,4120],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88135"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88135"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88135\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":88137,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88135\/revisions\/88137"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/88136"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.talkwithrattan.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}